“Just looking is
just hunting, but it is not quite right to say it is only hunting. There
is also something quietly hypnotic about just looking, something less like
hunting and more like dreaming. (…)
So just looking is
like hunting or being hunted, but it is also kin to hypnosis, nightmares, and
dreams. Those meanings draw near to yet another, because there is also a deep
parallel between looking and loving. Sometimes, falling in love really feels
like falling, as if you have no control (…). On other occasions love is all a
calculated pursuit. Some people spend their lives searching like detectives
among all the faces and bodies they can find. (…) But as lovers say, it’s not
always so easy to know who catches whom, and looking happens in both
directions. There might be a good definition of love here: love as the moment
when the prey becomes another hunter, so that both people are hunters and
hunted at once. (…)
It’s strange that
love stories begin to fill my mind when I meant to think only about looking,
and that is what I want to say about that phrase ‘just looking.’ It is not
possible; there is no such moment. All seeing is heated. It must always involve
force and desire and intent. (…) It doesn’t matter what I’m looking at (…);
‘just looking’ is a lie. I am always looking out, looking for,
even just looking around. (…) There is no looking that is not also directed
at something, aimed at some purpose. Looking is looking at or for
or just away. Everything that the eye falls on has some momentary
interest and possible use. (…)
When I say, ‘Just
looking,’ I mean I am searching, I have my ‘eye out’ for something. Looking is
hoping, desiring, never just taking in light, never merely collecting patterns
and data. Looking is possessing or the desire to possess—we eat food, we own
objects, and we ‘possess’ bodies—and there is no looking without thoughts of
using, possessing, repossessing, owning, fixing, appropriating, keeping,
remembering and commemorating, cherishing, borrowing, and stealing. I cannot
look at anything—any object, any person—without the shadow of the
thought of possessing that thing. Those appetites don’t just accompany looking,
they are looking itself.”
Elkins, James. The
Object Stares Back: On the Nature of Seeing. San Diego: Harcourt,
1997. 20-22.
Comente o excerto
acima apresentado, refletindo sobre a complexidade do conceito de visão.
O trabalho deve: ter, no máximo 2 páginas A4, letra de corpo 12, espaço e
meio (sem alterar as margens pré-definidas do Word); ser impresso e entregue em
mão durante a aula, até ao dia 28 de outubro.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário